Ghost of Truth

EU Investment Fund: The March into…

Ghost of Truth — Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:57:19 GMT

EU Investment Fund: The March into Socialism

Totalitarianism is characterized by the elimination of individual freedoms and the growth of the state into an entity with virtually unlimited internal power. The European Union’s plan to secure the financing of its expanding central state and arms sector by tapping into citizens’ savings unequivocally points in this direction.

It was just a year ago when former European Central Bank President Mario Draghi presented an investment plan intended to steer the EU—a ship languishing in the stagnant waters of recession—back onto the high seas. The Italian proposed a hefty 800 billion euros, which the Brussels central body would take control of to escape the productivity and growth trap through investments in Europe’s ailing infrastructure, technology hubs, and energy grid. This immense sum was to be managed through the EU’s established investment arms: the European Investment Bank, cohesion funds, and national and regional dependencies like Germany’s Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau. As has often been the case in the past, a cloak of silence fell over Draghi’s latest attempt at a centralized breakthrough, and his polished “Whatever it Takes” vanished amid the media waves of the Ukraine war, Russia sanctions, and sanctimonious Trump-bashing, relegated to the drawers of Brussels’ thousand-layered bureaucracy.

Now, ironically, it is Germany—the fiscal taskmaster that, during the recent debt crisis, ruthlessly drilled its southern European partners, particularly Greece, into submission with its austerity whip, driving them to despair and thrift—that has dusted off Draghi’s plan and brought it back to the table. Though the focus has shifted—now centered on Germany’s rearmament in the face of Putin-mania and the buildup of a European arms sector—the principle remains unchanged: the central state entity secures financing through new debt, stimulates aggregate demand, and leads the old continent to an Eden of growth and gleaming prosperity. So goes the theory. In practice, of course, things look very different, veering miles away from the bureaucrats’ sunny boulevard into the swampy forests of rising national debt and the progressive crowding out of the private sector. This state gigantomania threatens to drain liquidity from the free capital market and drive up interest rates—a trend already materializing in the sell-off of European government bonds in the days following the debt program’s announcement. German 10-year bonds shot up by 40 basis points within two days, setting the tone. The market appears saturated, and Europeans are finding it increasingly difficult to place new debt.

At this moment of geopolitical shift, as the Americans gradually withdraw from European affairs like the Ukraine war, creativity is required when economic options run dry. And they are creative in Brussels when it comes to geopolitical power plays and expanding the EU’s debt scheme. After all, the goal is not just to roll over the enormous existing debts of the Union’s member states, regions, municipalities, social security systems, and state funds into the future. The growing central apparatus in Brussels, fueled by the long-discredited Keynesian thesis of economic policy and the necessity of state intervention, is increasingly absorbing the productive forces of the private sector. We currently stand at the end of a decade in the EU with no significant productivity growth—an abysmal report card for EU economic policy in light of technological progress. Grade: F! The European economy, burdened by bureaucracy and regulation, can no longer translate the macro-impulses of robotics or AI into business models or align economic processes with international standards. Here’s a figure: last year, the German economy lost 136 billion euros in direct investments, much of which left the Eurozone. Once invested elsewhere, that capital won’t return anytime soon.

Back to the creative masterpiece of the Euro-acrobats in Brussels, who have long been racking their brains over how to finance their Brussels behemoth in the future. Citizens’ cash assets are to be the solution, says Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. Trillions of euros are lying unused and idle in European citizens’ accounts, and these must now be activated, according to the CDU politician. Respect for individual autonomy and sovereignty? Nowhere to be found! The EU is ruled by collective coercion, a naive belief in the omnipotence of state regulators, and a firm resolve to transfer private capital formation—soon with digital central bank money—into the hands of the state. The initiators of this assault on our sovereignty estimate the total volume of European cash deposits at 10 trillion euros—a hefty sum to underpin a potential new investment fund with the necessary collateral and stabilize it with the creditworthiness of European taxpayers. Leading the charge and legally responsible would be the European Commission (surprise, surprise), which, if this audacious stunt succeeds, would gain an enormous boost in power. Simultaneously, the long-delayed Capital Markets Union is set to be implemented, which, alongside deeper harmonization of the European banking sector, would primarily regulate the preparatory legal steps for joint debt issuance. Because that was the goal from the start: the establishment of a European Debt Union, leveraging Germany’s still-solid credit rating to refinance and expand the EU project. The American withdrawal comes at just the right time, providing the argumentative framework to hollow out the Maastricht criteria, which until now precluded collective debt. Times have changed!

Active management is expected to be entrusted to the European Investment Bank—an institution with extensive experience in centrally controlled fund distribution within the EU. It serves as both the Brussels central planners’ “watering can” and is ready to step into the game. Cash deposits, low-interest money market products, or pension fund assets are to be tapped. The plan is to lure citizens with a savings scheme offering interest and a fixed return promise. Once the fund is filled, it will serve as the basis for bond issuances, providing valuable leverage for the initial capital. The European Central Bank would then have the honorable task of keeping these bonds liquid—a fate likely similar to that of the EU’s “SURE” bonds introduced during the COVID lockdowns. These first-of-their-kind joint debt securities are trading stably at 40 percent below par, with no volume—the market says “Nyet” to this kind of debt acceleration. At the core of the investments is the financing of military technology—drones, tanks, cybersecurity—and the buildup of the general production infrastructure for a European military sector.

This, then, is the path Brussels is now taking. Naturally, small and medium-sized enterprises are not to be left out of this investment offensive, according to Brussels. Of course not—after all, it’s precisely these small businesses that dominate the arms sector. How do we know? From the American military-industrial complex, which serves as a model for Europeans and is dominated by classic mid-sized firms like Lockheed Martin or RTX.

#eu #ecb #europe #socialism #trump #usa #bitcoin #nostr #grownostr

Trump On The EU: We'll…

Ghost of Truth — Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:44:11 GMT

Trump On The EU: We'll Win That Financial Battle

During the press meeting with the Irish Prime Minister, US President Donald Trump has once again clearly defined what he sees as his geopolitical enemy: the European Union! Rarely have politicians at this level spoken more clearly and given us a hint as to what could happen next.

With the withdrawal of the United States from the Ukraine battlefield, the European Union has now found the scapegoat for something it has been planning for a long time: the consolidation of government debt in a common fund, curated by the European Commission and kept liquid under the care of the European Central Bank and its interventions on the bond market. In this way, both institutions would allow themselves an enormous increase in power, with the European Central Bank in particular virtually outgrowing itself.

However, what then presents itself here as collective collateral, as euro debt, is more than just a fragile credit substrate of the highly indebted euro states. It is highly endangered credit, as the eurozone can no longer leave the waters of recession, while the waves of geopolitics are causing the ship of state europe, if that is what you want to call this violent construct, to lurch violently.

To prevent this fiscal policy tightrope act from failing immediately, officials in Brussels and in the ECB's Frankfurt tower are openly talking about the introduction of digital central bank money, cbdc, as early as this fall. Panic is in the air, Europeans' fear of capital flight from the crisis-ridden eurozone to the United States is thickening the air in Europe to the point where you can almost cut it.

The German plan to implement the gigantic debt program proposed a year ago by former ECB President Mario Draghi to revive the eurozone economy as part of Germany's rearmament has caused panic selling on the eurozone bond markets. Much of this capital found its way into European defense companies. They now stand as a godfather for the Europeans' attempt to build their own military industrial complex, which would of course be centrally controlled and promise Brussels a last hope of stimulating growth. It is in this context that European representatives of all powers are now trying to manipulate and undermine the peace negotiations between Russia, Ukraine and the United States. A peace treaty would be the worst thing that could thwart these plans. This is the hour of the anti-diplomats, of BoJo the Clown and other weirdos who represent the geopolitical interests of London and have no regard for any humanitarian successes.

The gates out of the eurozone are slowly closing, capital controls and the ECB's infamous control money are looming on a cloudy horizon. At this point, I have to take sides with Bitcoin. Bitcoin can replace this gateway for the little man at this point and help to protect his purchasing power from the encroaching functionaries from Brussels and the European capitals as well as the European Central Bank. The fact that officials from the EU and the European Central Bank keep referring either to the irrelevance of Bitcoin or to its merciless failure says more than a thousand words. It's a kind of coronation ceremony, performed by those who normally crown themselves with the crown, not realizing that they are doing the business of their mortal enemy by repeatedly pointing to it in an attention-grabbing way.

It simply fits into the picture that President Trump has announced the introduction of the strategic Bitcoin reserve and is pursuing a pro-Bitcoin policy. This time, he is not just engaging in polite rhetoric, he is actually taking action and thus underlining the seriousness of his efforts to show functionaries and central planners of the European Union their limits. Bitcoin is an excellent instrument for defending our individual freedom, especially when it comes to individual freedom or digital prison. It almost seems as if we are witnessing the resurgence of the systemic conflict of freedom versus collectivism, only in this case Europeans are openly taking sides with the devolutionary program of socialism. And the downward spiral on the old continent is spinning faster and faster.
The time to act is now, not in October!

#eu #ezb #euro #usa #trump #usd #bitcoin #news #nostr #cbdc #grownostr

Eurozone: Watch Out For Capital Flight

Ghost of Truth — Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:42:12 GMT

Eurozone: Watch Out For Capital Flight

Central planners in the European Union are under massive pressure and the alarm sirens are ringing not only in the Frankfurt ECB Tower, but also in Brussels and London, where the big cribs are being drawn. The fact that ECB President Christine Lagarde, of all people, announced the introduction of digital control money, the euro CBDC, three days ago must be seen in a global context.

The sacking of Vladimir Selensky from the White House was a sign that the Ukrainian credit pump is being shut off, that Americans are no longer prepared to tie their economic and social future to the fate of war-mongering Europeans und EU socialists. They now have to deal with the self-created problem in Ukraine themselves and are plunging into massive orgies of debt, which can be seen in the example of Germany which has just announced a 500 billion euro arms program, financed of course with the credit pump, immediately after the Bundestag elections.

The result is refinancing problems on the bond markets, with liquidity squeezes on the horizon for the eurozone. And it seems that there won't be a second coronavirus to justify freezing the economy and pumping subsidies directly into the system without risking hyperinflation and the collapse of the euro.

So now the CBDC in the eurozone, planned from October, a sign of panic in the capitals of the eurozone in the face of massive debt, deepening recessionary trends and the withdrawal of the Americans from co-financing the bankrupt Europeans. A CBDC is nothing else than capital controls to prevent the flight of capital to the USA, while getting rid of the problem of public debt at the expense of the citizens via inflation. At least that's the plan. It can therefore be assumed that before it is introduced, we will see massive flight movements to the location that treats capital better and more respectfully than the euro-commies do these days.

So let's pay attention to the barometer of this capital flight, the interest rate spreads between US government bonds and those of Germany or France. If the capital flight from the eurozone to the USA begins, this spread will explode (european rares rising rapidly as the bonds will be selling off, US bonds vice versa). And following Kristin Lagarde's logic again, this explosion is expected in the fall. Let's stay vigilant!

#europe #Euro #ecb #EU #usa #trump #debt #bitcoin #nostr #fiatponzi #cbdc

Tariffs: Echoes from Ancient Rome…

Ghost of Truth — Mon, 03 Mar 2025 12:29:16 GMT

Tariffs: Echoes from Ancient Rome

At its greatest extent under its emperor Trajan, the Imperium Romanum dominated the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and vast areas of the European continent, Northern Africa and the Middle East. Its political influence also helped to consolidate and pacify trade. The stable, high volume of commerce provided the central power in Rome with a rich source of income through customs policy - a topic that has been the subject of heated debate since the tide changed in the White House.

Picture Rome before Augustus took the reins around 27 BC. The financial system was a mess - a sprawling beast where local officials and provincial governors collected whatever they could grab, often pocketing more than they reported. It was less an economy and more a free-for-all, with corruption as common as the cobblestones on the Appian Way. Then came Augustus, stepping in to centralize and streamline Rome’s fiscal chaos. By 6 AD, he rolled out the Portorium publicum, a tariff system that wasn’t just about raking in denarii but about weaving an economic web across the empire. This wasn’t petty governance; it was a grand strategy, a way to assert control over the arteries of trade that pulsed through Rome’s vast domain.

The Roman state’s financial machinery was a marvel of its time, a complex tapestry of revenue streams that kept the empire humming. Before Augustus’ reforms, the state leaned heavily on direct taxes—the tributum—which hit landowners and citizens based on their wealth and property. Historians estimate this made up about 30-40% of Rome’s state income by the late 1st century BC, a steady flow that paid for legions, infrastructure like roads or aqueducts, and the occasional lavish triumph and the famous vulgar games - 'panem et circenses', financed by the tax payer to entertain a growing army of parasitically living individuals from all parts of the known world. But it wasn’t enough on its own, and that’s where the indirect taxes like the Portorium came in, pulling in roughly 20-30% of the total haul. Within that slice, the Portorium itself might’ve accounted for 10-20%, depending on the ebb and flow of trade across the Mediterranean and beyond.

This tariff wasn’t just a tax; it was Rome’s way of putting a tollbooth on every trade route, ensuring that every amphora of wine or bundle of silk moving through its ports or frontiers paid its dues. Free trade principles weren't even a dream, they were completely out of reach as geopolitics those days were power politics in its basic form. Controlling the bottlenecks like the Dardanells were crucial part of stabilizing centralized power - a phenomenon we're witnessing again in our days, thinking of the Suez or Panama Channels. Bloodlines of Roman power where the flourishing provinces, the empire’s cash cows. From 27 BC to 14 AD, as Augustus solidified his grip, tributes from conquered lands and the spoils of war brought in another 20-30% of the state’s revenue. Think of it like Rome’s version of colonial dividends - gold, grain, and slaves funneled back to the capital from places like Gaul, Egypt, the depths of Africa or Sarmathia and Hispania. And let’s not forget the miscellaneous streams: selling public offices, tapping into mining profits, and other creative hustles that could’ve added another 10-20% to the pot. By the Pax Romana’s height in the 2nd century AD, this mix was a well-oiled machine, balancing the empire’s sprawling needs with a ruthless efficiency that modern central banks might envy.

The Portorium wasn’t just about the numbers, though. It was Rome’s economic heartbeat, a tool for more than just filling the treasury. Augustus didn’t slap tariffs on goods out of boredom; he used them to control the empire’s lifeblood - international trade which included even the famous east asian trade routes, the Silk Road. By setting standardized rates around 6 AD, he gave merchants a predictable game to play, not unlike how Bitcoin promises stability in a wild financial world. If you were shipping spices from the East or marble from Greece, you knew what Rome would take at the gate, and that predictability fostered commerce even as it lined imperial pockets. It was a delicate dance: keep the provinces prosperous enough to pay, but tethered tight enough to never forget who held the reins. The execution of this system leaned on the publicani, Rome’s tax farmers and a real plague for their respect people, a practice that stretched back to the 2nd century BC. These private contractors bid for the right to collect tariffs, turning tax collection into a competitive enterprise. It was a brilliant outsourcing move: Rome set the rules, the publicani played the game, and the state reaped the rewards. Of course, it wasn’t flawless; corruption crept in like weeds in a vineyard, prompting reforms by the 3rd century AD to tighten oversight. Still, the ingenuity of it all - turning tax collection into a profit-driven hustle - feels like a distant ancestor to today’s public-private partnerships.

Fast forward to 2025, and the parallels are uncanny. Nations wield tariffs like Rome once did, not just for revenue but for leverage. The U.S. hikes duties on Chinese tech to protect its industries; the EU adjusts post-Brexit trade barriers to redefine its economic borders; developing nations shield their markets to grow without being swallowed by giants. It’s all about control: over wealth, influence, and stability - just as Augustus sought control over his empire’s economic flows. The Portorium integrated Rome’s diverse regions under one economic umbrella, much like modern trade blocs try to harmonize their members while fending off outsiders. Rome centralized its economy to stabilize an empire (it failed in the end); today, we wrestle with whether centralized policies or decentralized systems like Bitcoin hold the key to economic freedom. The Portorium was Rome’s way of saying, “We’ll let you trade, but on our terms,” a sentiment echoed in every tariff hike or trade sanction we see today. By the empire’s peak in the 2nd century AD, this system had evolved into a cornerstone of Roman dominance, proving that economic policy could be as mighty a weapon as any legion. Rome’s example stands as a reminder: control the flow of wealth, and you control the game. History doesn’t just repeat—it resonates, and the echoes of Roman tariffs are loud and clear in 2025.

#History #AncientRome #Tariffs #StateFinance #Bitcoin #Nostr #TradePolicy #HistoryLessons #Grownostr #Economx #usa #trump

Europe's Struggle For Russian Reparations…

Ghost of Truth — Sat, 01 Mar 2025 11:36:23 GMT

Europe's Struggle For Russian Reparations And Collaterals

Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky's expulsion from the White House was the bizarre highlight of an even more bizarre political week in Washington, which saw numerous visitors from the European Union as guests of Donald Trump. Alongside the Frenchman Macron and his English counterpart Starmer, Zelensky was also there once again - and the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is also expected to visit the White House shortly to put forward what is really at stake in the Ukraine conflict: the continued funding of the money pump! !

The withdrawal of the USA from the financing of the Ukraine project has startled them all and has made Europeans aware of their own economic and military impotence these days. The high point of this awakening was the fact that the USA is negotiating exclusively with Russia and no longer even reserves a seat at the cat's table for the Europeans when it comes to the European issue of Ukraine.

Trump has thus revealed that all the sabre-rattling by the Europeans in the Russia affair, all the sanctions packages were nothing more than the barking of a disabled dog that is no longer even able to adequately stake out its original territory.

In this context, the question of how to deal with the Russian assets frozen by the European Union, especially those of the Russian Central Bank, is raised time and again. As an economic background, it is important to know that the European Union has immense liquidity problems, especially in its banking sector and in view of the problems in the eurozone and the immense distortions in the common currency; they need new collateral in order to be able to create new credit.

And this is exactly where the Russian assets come into play. the expropriation, which I will describe in more detail below, comprises around 235 billion dollars in assets, which the European Union would very much like to use as the initial financing for so-called Eurobonds, the common financing of the European Union's immense mountain of debt, in order to buy itself a few more years and remain liquid. Similar ideas also apply to Russian reparations payments in the event of Moscow's defeat, which would above all help the Bank of England, one of the main guarantors of Ukraine's national debt, to get back on its feet.

It is precisely these kinds of mind games that keep resonating in the Europeans' attempts to escalate the Russian war. In order to achieve this goal, London in particular had firmly counted on the military intervention of the Americans, who have now done a 180 degree turnaround, leaving the Europeans naked.

To emphasize this turnaround once again, Selensky was expelled from the White House. It can therefore be assumed that the issue of Russian assets will be raised again in the coming days and weeks. Finally, let's take a look at the structure of these assets.

Overview of Frozen Assets

The EU has imposed sanctions in response to Russia’s actions, particularly following the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. These sanctions include asset freezes targeting both Russian state entities (such as the Central Bank of Russia) and private individuals or companies (e.g., oligarchs and sanctioned entities).

The frozen assets fall into two main categories:

State-owned assets, primarily reserves of the Central Bank of Russia.

Private assets, belonging to individuals and entities listed under EU sanctions.

1. Central Bank of Russia Assets

Total Value: Approximately €210 billion (around $215 billion USD, depending on exchange rates) of Russian Central Bank reserves have been immobilized in the EU as of mid-2023, with updates suggesting this figure has remained stable or slightly adjusted by 2025.

Nature of Assets: These are primarily financial reserves held in foreign currencies, securities, and other liquid instruments. Most of these assets are managed by central securities depositories (CSDs) like Euroclear in Belgium, which holds the largest share.

Location: The majority is held in Belgium, with smaller portions distributed across other EU countries such as Germany, France, and Luxembourg.

Legal Status: These assets are "immobilized" rather than confiscated, meaning they cannot be accessed or managed by Russia but remain in place pending further legal or political decisions. The EU has begun using the extraordinary profits (e.g., interest) from these assets, estimated at €2.5–3 billion annually, to support Ukraine as of May 2024.

2. Private Assets of Individuals and Entities

Total Value: As of late 2022, the EU had frozen €17.5 billion worth of assets belonging to Russian oligarchs, individuals, and companies. Earlier figures from June 2022 cited €12.5 billion, indicating a significant increase over time. Posts on X and other sources suggest that by 2025, the total value of frozen private assets may exceed €20 billion, though no official update confirms this precisely as of March 1, 2025.

Number of Targets: Over 1,350 individuals and entities are subject to asset freezes, including oligarchs, government officials, and companies linked to Russia’s war efforts.

Types of Assets:

Real Estate: Luxury properties such as villas, mansions, and apartments across EU countries, particularly in France, Italy, Spain, and Cyprus. Examples include properties owned by oligarchs like Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman.

Yachts: High-profile seizures include superyachts like the Dilbar (owned by Usmanov, seized in Germany) and the Amore Vero (linked to Igor Sechin, seized in France). These vessels are often valued in the tens or hundreds of millions of euros.

Helicopters and Private Jets: Aircraft owned by sanctioned individuals have been grounded and frozen, such as those linked to Gennady Timchenko and Alexey Mordashov.

Art and Valuables: Paintings, sculptures, and other high-value items, including collections seized from oligarchs’ residences or storage facilities.

Financial Assets: Bank accounts, investments, and shares in EU-based companies controlled by sanctioned persons. For instance, accounts tied to Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman in Alfa Group were frozen in 2022.

Business Holdings: Stakes in EU-based firms or subsidiaries owned by Russian entities, such as those linked to Rostec or Sovcomflot, have been subjected to asset freezes.

Oligarchs’ Assets: By June 2022, €12.5 billion in private assets were reported frozen, doubling from earlier estimates in April. This included yachts, helicopters, and real estate.

Entities: Companies like Sogaz (insurance), Alfa Bank, and Russian Railways faced asset freezes, impacting their financial holdings and operational assets in the EU.

Additional Details

Windfall Profits: Since May 2024, the EU has redirected net profits from immobilized Central Bank assets (e.g., €557 million earned between February and April 2024) to Ukraine, with 90% allocated for military support and 10% for reconstruction.

Updates in 2024-2025: The 15th sanctions package (December 2024) added 54 individuals and 30 entities, further expanding the scope of frozen assets, though specific values for these additions are not yet detailed.

#geopolitics #ukraine #russia #usa #eu #uk #trump #zelenski #bitcoin #nostr #plebchain #news

Commentary On The Planned US Sovereign…

Ghost of Truth — Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:09:15 GMT

Commentary On The Planned US Sovereign Wealth Fund

With his latest initiative to set up a state investment fund, Donald Trump has taken the financial markets in a different direction. Many, especially in my opinion unfortunately bitcoiners, are jumping on this bandwagon and rushing into this juggernaut full of anticipation (I know: hyperbitcoinization and all that...). Nevertheless, the question must be: is it right for the state to intervene in the capital markets with public funds? My personal assessment: no, absolutely not. The state should keep its hands off it! It is the territory of the private sector, which is already suffering from too much regulation and interventionism. Efficient capital allocation does not need this! And we don't want a strong state, but a minimal state, if at all.

Some thought on the SWF:

The very foundation of a SWF contradicts the libertarian principle of economic freedom . By centralizing wealth, states exert control over investment decisions that should naturally be left to the market's invisible hand. This control leads to inefficiencies, as government officials, often detached from the real dynamics of the market, make decisions based on political rather than economic merit. The market, in its purest form, would distribute wealth and risk more efficiently through countless individual decisions rather than one monolithic entity.

Moral and Ethical Considerations
There's a moral dimension to consider as well. The libertarian ethos champions the idea that wealth generated from resources within a nation's borders should benefit those who directly contribute to its extraction or production, not be funneled into a fund where the government decides its fate. This approach borders on what could be described as modern feudalism, where the lords of the state dictate the destiny of the common wealth.

Political Power and Corruption
The concentration of economic power in SWFs also amplifies political power, breeding grounds for corruption and cronyism. Just as we've seen with central banks and planners, the management of these funds can become a playground for political favoritism, where investments are not made for the best return but to maintain political allies or to pursue geopolitical strategies over economic ones.

So please, dear politicians: keep your hands off the free market.

#swf #usa #capitalism #trump #bitcoin #economy #nostr #grownostr #plebchain